Author’s ideas, The course lasted four weeks., The study involved 36 university students., Half the students discussed the articles with a partner before writing., Summaries written after pair discussions included more of the articles’ central ideas., The two groups did not differ substantially in their number of grammatical errors., The author suggests that discussion may support understanding of a source., Students read short academic articles before completing weekly summaries., The author cautions against assuming that the results apply to longer courses., The research took place in a university writing course., The students wrote summaries every week., My comments, I wonder whether the results would be different in a semester-long course., This finding could help me discuss activities students complete before writing., I would like to know whether the students were allowed to choose their partners., I think discussing an article might help students check their understanding., I could use this source when explaining why my project examines reading before writing., I wonder what the students talked about during their discussions., I think the four-week duration is an important limitation., I could compare this study with research conducted over a longer period., Needs correction, Pair discussion eliminated grammatical errors from students’ summaries., The students who worked individually did not read the articles., Pair discussion improves every aspect of academic writing., This proves that all university writing classes should require pair work., Students in the pair-discussion group received better grades in every assignment., Pair discussion reduced grammatical errors more than individual work did., The study demonstrates that discussion is the only effective way to understand an academic article.
0%
Source notes categories
Compartir
Compartir
per en/la
Mariacruzsa18
Editar continguts
Guarda
M'agrada
Imprimir
Incrustar
Més
Assignacions
Tauler de classificació
Mostrar-ne més
Mostrar-ne menys
Aquesta taula de classificació és privada actualment. Fés clic a
Compartir
per fer-la públic.
El propietari del recurs ha inhabilitat aquesta taula de classificació.
Aquesta taula de classificació està inhabilitada perquè que les teves opcions són diferents a les del propietari del recurs.
Reverteix les opcions
Endreç del grup
és una plantilla de final obert. No genera puntuacions per a una taula de classificació.
Cal iniciar la sessió
Estil visual
Tipus de lletra
Subscripció obligatòria
Opcions
AI Enhanced: Aquesta activitat conté contingut generat per IA.
Aprèn més.
Canvia de fonament
Mostrar-ho tot
Resultats oberts
Copiar enllaç
Codi QR
Suprimir
Restaurar desada automàtica:
?