1) Research design, This study used a two-group quasi-experimental design to examine whether app-based spaced retrieval improves short- and medium-term retention of academic collocations. The independent variable was study condition (spaced-retrieval app vs self-study). The primary outcomes were gains on an immediate post-test and a delayed post-test. A brief questionnaire provided supporting data on learner perceptions and study behaviour., 2) Participants / data sources, Twenty-eight doctoral students from a large European university volunteered for the study (16 female, 12 male; mean age 29.4). Participants represented engineering, life sciences, and social sciences, and all reported writing in English at least monthly. Eligibility criteria were: (i) currently enrolled in a PhD programme and (ii) no prior systematic training in spaced retrieval. All participants provided informed consent and were free to withdraw at any time without penalty., 3) Materials / instruments, We used (i) a 40-item vocabulary test consisting of target academic collocations (e.g. pose a challenge, yield results), (ii) a short background questionnaire (discipline, L1, prior exposure to academic writing instruction), and (iii) a study log exported from the spaced-retrieval app showing total minutes studied and number of review sessions. The app delivered retrieval prompts and scheduled reviews automatically. All test items were piloted with a separate cohort (n=8) to check clarity and difficulty., 4) Procedure, Participants completed a pre-test and background questionnaire in Week 1. They were then assigned either to an app-based spaced-retrieval condition or to a conventional self-study condition, and both groups received the same list of target collocations. Over the following 14 days, the app group completed daily 10-minute review sessions, while the self-study group was asked to review the list independently for the same total time. An immediate post-test took place on Day 15 and a delayed post-test on Day 29; both tests were administered online under timed conditions., 5) Data analysis, Responses were analysed in two stages. First, we computed a retention score for each participant (immediate post-test minus pre-test; delayed post-test minus pre-test). Second, we compared mean scores across groups using an independent-samples t-test and reported effect sizes (Cohen’s d) with 95% confidence intervals. For the questionnaire, Likert-scale items were summarised descriptively and open comments were coded for recurring themes (e.g. workload, usability, perceived transfer to writing)..
0%
Methods Section Structure
Teilen
Teilen
Teilen
von
Fabioslesio1
Inhalt bearbeiten
Drucken
Einbetten
Mehr
Zuweisungen
Bestenliste
Mehr anzeigen
Weniger anzeigen
Diese Bestenliste ist derzeit privat. Klicke auf
Teilen
um sie öffentlich zu machen.
Diese Bestenliste wurde vom Eigentümer der Ressource deaktiviert.
Diese Bestenliste ist deaktiviert, da sich Ihre Einstellungen von denen des Eigentümer der Ressource unterscheiden.
Einstellungen zurücksetzen
Die richtige Gruppe
ist eine Vorlage mit offenem Ende. Es generiert keine Punkte für eine Bestenliste.
Anmelden erforderlich
Visueller Stil
Schriftarten
Abonnement erforderlich
Einstellungen
Vorlage ändern
Alle anzeigen
Weitere Formate werden angezeigt, wenn du die Aktivität spielst.
)
Offene Ergebnisse
Link kopieren
QR-Code
Löschen
Soll die automatisch gespeicherte Aktivität
wiederhergestellt werden?