True or False? Wrap-around supports reach families unevenly depending on the program site., True. 61% of parents knew SOS could help their family find supports and 36% had used them, but awareness ranged from almost all parents at some IPs to only a quarter at others., True or False? Programs using a shorter cohort cycle model (1-3 weeks) show somewhat stronger results than ones that run for the full summer., False. Children in full-summer programs reported slightly more improvement than children in shorter cohorts (81% vs. 76%). Parents did not report the same difference., True or False? School staff see children returning more ready and more connected., True. The four school and district staff interviewed described SOS participants coming back “more ready and more mature”, with stronger social skills, and SOS limiting the summer “reset”., True or False? More effort could be made by program sites to better reach the desired target group., False. In 2026, SOS children were 78% racialized, 48% newcomers/refugees, 27% Indigenous and 20% with exceptional needs., True or False? Registration timing prevented some target children from attending this summer., True. This was raised by both parents/caregivers and school staff interviewed., True or False? Academic skills were reported to be the area of least positive improvement in every data source, and school staff interviewed would like to see this improved., False. The four school staff interviewed cautioned that summer programs for these children should centre on play and relationships rather than academics., True or False? Parents/caregivers reported more positive improvement than children on every outcome domain and priority area question in the survey., True. 93% of parent's combined responses were positive (“Yes!” or “Kind of”) vs. 78% of the children’s., True or False? Children at Indigenous-led programs reported more overall positive improvement than other children when all outcome domains and SOS priority areas were combined., True. 83% of children at Indigenous-led programs reported positive improvement versus 77% at non-Indigenous-led programs. Their parents reported about the same level of improvement as other parents (91% vs. 93%)., SOS children reported positive improvements at different rates compared to children in the school-year School’s Out program., False. Results for positive improvement in the strongest and weakest individual outcome statements are the same in both. “Feeling proud of who they are” and “Being more interested in trying new things” are the strongest.
0%
Question #4
Teilen
Teilen
von
Kylieh
Inhalt bearbeiten
Speichern
Gefällt mir
Drucken
Einbetten
Mehr
Zuweisungen
Bestenliste
Mehr anzeigen
Weniger anzeigen
Diese Bestenliste ist derzeit privat. Klicke auf
Teilen
um sie öffentlich zu machen.
Diese Bestenliste wurde vom Eigentümer der Ressource deaktiviert.
Diese Bestenliste ist deaktiviert, da sich Ihre Einstellungen von denen des Eigentümer der Ressource unterscheiden.
Einstellungen zurücksetzen
Flash-Karten
ist eine Vorlage mit offenem Ende. Es generiert keine Punkte für eine Bestenliste.
Anmelden erforderlich
Visueller Stil
Schriftarten
Abonnement erforderlich
Einstellungen
Vorlage ändern
Alle anzeigen
Offene Ergebnisse
Link kopieren
QR-Code
Löschen
Soll die automatisch gespeicherte Aktivität
wiederhergestellt werden?