Inductive Reasoning, Reasoning that begins with specific observations and moves toward a probable general conclusion. It is a posteriori and based on empirical evidence., A Posteriori, Knowledge based on experience or observation, verified or falsified using empirical evidence., Cosmological Argument, An inductive, a posteriori argument claiming that the existence of the universe requires a cause, ultimately leading to a First Cause (God)., Aquinas’ First Way (Motion), Everything in motion is moved by something else; an infinite regress is impossible; therefore, there must be an unmoved mover (God)., Aquinas’ Second Way (Causation), Nothing can cause itself; there cannot be an infinite chain of causes; therefore, there must be a first efficient cause (God)., Aquinas’ Third Way (Contingency), Everything in the universe is contingent; if everything were contingent, nothing would exist; therefore, there must be a necessary being (God)., Teleological Argument (Design Argument), An inductive argument claiming that the order and purpose in the world indicate design, pointing to a designer (God)., Anthropic Principle (Tennant), The universe appears fine‑tuned for human life; this suggests purposeful design rather than chance., Aesthetic Argument (Tennant), Human appreciation of beauty and art goes beyond survival needs, suggesting a designer who created a world with aesthetic value., Empirical Evidence, Information gained through observation or experience, forming the basis of inductive arguments., Infinite Regress, A criticism that Aquinas’ rejection of an infinite chain of causes is not necessarily justified., Fallacy of Composition (Hume), The error of assuming that what is true of the parts is true of the whole (e.g., every event has a cause → the universe must have a cause)., Problem of Analogy (Hume), Critique of the design argument: the world is not sufficiently like human-designed objects to justify the analogy., Epicurean Hypothesis, Given infinite time, order could arise by chance rather than design., Inductive Leap, The move from observed evidence to a broader conclusion—always probabilistic, never certain..
0%
Inductive Arguments - Key Terms
Partager
Partager
Partager
par
Lucybaker
Modifier le contenu
Imprimer
Incorporer
Plus
Affectations
Classement
Afficher plus
Afficher moins
Ce classement est actuellement privé. Cliquez sur
Partager
pour le rendre public.
Ce classement a été désactivé par le propriétaire de la ressource.
Ce classement est désactivé car vos options sont différentes pour le propriétaire de la ressource.
Rétablir les Options
Apparier
est un modèle à composition non limitée. Il ne génère pas de points pour un classement.
Connexion requise
Style visuel
Polices
Abonnement requis
Options
Changer de modèle
Afficher tout
D'autres formats apparaîtront au fur et à mesure que vous jouerez l'activité.
)
Ouvrir les résultats
Copier le lien
Code QR
Supprimer
Restauration auto-sauvegardé :
?