The building lacks aesthetic appeal due to its unconventional shape - Don’t use the text to evaluate whether or not a building is good or bad., The design of this building was heavily influenced by government regulations - Don’t focus on government, planning or legislative constraints that influenced the design. Instead, look at the disciplinary ideas and cultural factors that shape architecture., The architect's use of sustainable materials in this project reflects the growing concern for environmental consciousness in the 1970s. - Don’t try to situate your project outside of the 80s and 90s context—e.g. as a response to WWII or modern architecture., The building is a prime example of Critical Regionalism - Don’t try to ‘pigeonhole’ a project, or over-simplify your building to make it fit a single category or idea. Instead, acknowledge its contradictions. If it is complex, explain those complexities., As Venturi pointed out, the space embodies harmony and balance in every detail - Don’t regurgitate the words and ideas of the architect themselves. Be critical of their work, and of what they say—an architect is often a very poor judge of what is significant about their own design!,

Station 5

oleh
Cetak
Menyematkan

Papan Peringkat

Gaya visual

Pilihan

Berganti templat

Pulihkan simpan otomatis: ?