BRIGGS: emphasizes faith in jury and legal system, primarily questions credibility of the prosecution's witnesses, mentions James King briefly, does not offer explicit arguments in favor of King's innocence, O'BRIEN: praises jury and their responsibility, points out lack of credibility of the prosecution's witnesses, explains extensively why Steve was not involved, points put difference between Steve's character and the ones of the other young men, emphasizes that Steve's guilt has not been proven, PETROCELLI: briefly recognizes jury's role, argues that the witnesses of minor importance, emphasizes the importance of the deed and its outcome, focusses on the victim's fate, infers King's and Steve's guilt, but cannot offer any definite proof,

Closing Arguments

さんの投稿です
印刷
埋め込み

リーダーボード

表示スタイル

オプション

テンプレートを切り替える

自動保存: を復元しますか?