1) What’s causing the project delay? a) Component supply issues reduced our capacity, putting the deadline at risk. b) We faced a resource allocation issue after one engineer took emergency leave. 2) How can we handle the risk of missing the deliverable? a) We can mitigate it by reallocating resources or simplifying the scope. b) Let’s prioritize the essential features and move minor ones to the next sprint. 3) Can we speed up production? a) We could allocate some work to an external team to increase capacity. b) We can request additional resources to meet the deadline. 4) Why did the simulation fail? a) There was a discrepancy between test data and expected parameters. b) The validation process revealed an error in the new firmware version. 5) What’s the next action item? a) We’ll validate the cooling system design and prepare documentation. b) The next deliverable is the updated system specification. 6) Who should take ownership of this issue? a) Let’s escalate it to the project manager for a decision. b) The lead engineer should handle it since it’s a design-related problem. 7) What’s your feedback on the new layout? a) It aligns with the original specification, but needs minor adjustments. b) It looks good, but we should validate it against the requirements. 8) Have all teams reached agreement? a) Yes, we’ve achieved consensus on the integration plan. b) Not yet — we still need alignment from the QA team. 9) How do we ensure a smooth handoff? a) By adhering to the coding protocol and updating documentation. b) We can organize a short handoff meeting to clarify open action items. 10) What should we report in the weekly meeting? a) Progress, key risks, and all open action items. b) We’ll include status updates and any issues that need management feedback.

conversation

印刷
埋め込み

リーダーボード

表示スタイル

オプション

テンプレートを切り替える

自動保存: を復元しますか?