Credible: A science textbook written by teachers, A news article from last week with quotes from experts, A government website with statistics, An encyclopedia entry reviewed by editors, A peer‑reviewed science journal article, A history book published by a well‑known publisher, A university website explaining a topic, A newspaper article from a trusted news organization, A museum website with artifacts and explanations, An interview with a recognized expert in the field, NOT Credible: A random blog post with no author name, A YouTube video with no sources, A rumor from a friend, A social media post with no evidence, A website with lots of ads and no author listed, A classmate’s guess without checking facts, A Wikipedia page edited by an unknown person yesterday, A celebrity opinion on science without proof, A chain email or forwarded message, A TikTok video making claims but showing no sources,

En - Th.CW - Grade 5 - Unit 2.1 Credibility Checks and Source Evaluation

印刷
埋め込み

リーダーボード

表示スタイル

オプション

テンプレートを切り替える

自動保存: を復元しますか?