Length of Training Programme (effective), This was because 6 weeks was long enough to see improvements without getting bored and giving up. This means that I did not waste time during sessions, worked to 100% of my ability at all times, and seen the best improvements possible., Variety of approaches (effective), This was because I changed my session each day to make sure it was different. I went between Fartlek Training, Interval Training, and Continuous Training to ensure no session was the same which kept me interested and motivated. This means that I was more likely to put 100% effort in as wasn't bored, and therefore made improvements throughout my PDP., Training Partner (ineffective), This was because I trained with my best friend and we continuously talked and carried on instead of staying focussed on the activity. This means that I did not give 100% in my training as I was distracted by my peer, therefore limited the improvements I could have made as I was not working at the correct intensity., Cool Down (ineffective), This was because I never left much time at the end of each sessions, which meant I either rushed the exercises or never completed it at all. This means that my muscles were sore the next day and I was still sore for my next training session. Therefore, I wasn't able to complete that session properly and limit my chance of improving., Frequency of sessions (ineffective), This is because I trained 3 times a week (Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday), which meant I had no rest days. This meant by day 3 my body was exhausted and sore which meant I couldn't complete my session. Therefore I limited my chance of improving as if I had taken a rest day I would have been able to get more out of the session as I wouldn't be as tired.

3D

さんの投稿です
印刷
埋め込み

リーダーボード

表示スタイル

オプション

テンプレートを切り替える

自動保存: を復元しますか?