1, Computers are in movies and real life now., 2, People think humans are special., 3, Do computers really talk and understand like people?, 4, The "mentalist" idea: Computers cannot understand because they have no mind., 5, The "behaviorist" idea: If a machine acts like it understands, then it does understand., 7, Two ideas about minds. Both seem a little right. Normal thinking cannot choose one., 8, A problem for people who think machines cannot have minds. A robot that acts like your mother seems to have a mind, too., 9, It is not logical. You believe your mother has a mind because of her actions. But you do not believe the robot has a mind from the same actions., 10, A problem for people who think actions are everything. We know our own feelings inside. A machine without feelings does not have a real mind., 11, From the outside, the robot and a person seem the same. From the inside, you know your own mind. A machine might not have this inside life., 12 , It is a difficult problem. We know other people's minds only from what they do. So, a machine that acts the same way seems to have a mind, too., 13 , Another way to see it: from the inside. From this view, a machine that acts like a person may still not have a mind., 14, Thinking about computer minds leads to a big philosophy problem..
0%
mind
공유
공유
공유
만든이
Altabasovaz
콘텐츠 편집
인쇄
퍼가기
더보기
할당
순위표
더 보기
접기
이 순위표는 현재 비공개입니다.
공유
를 클릭하여 공개할 수 있습니다.
자료 소유자가 이 순위표를 비활성화했습니다.
옵션이 자료 소유자와 다르기 때문에 이 순위표가 비활성화됩니다.
옵션 되돌리기
매치업
(은)는 개방형 템플릿입니다. 순위표에 올라가는 점수를 산출하지 않습니다.
로그인이 필요합니다
비주얼 스타일
글꼴
구독 필요
옵션
템플릿 전환하기
모두 표시
액티비티를 플레이할 때 더 많은 포맷이 나타납니다.
)
결과 열기
링크 복사
QR 코드
삭제
자동 저장된
게임을 복구할까요?