1) Research design, This study used a two-group quasi-experimental design to examine whether app-based spaced retrieval improves short- and medium-term retention of academic collocations. The independent variable was study condition (spaced-retrieval app vs self-study). The primary outcomes were gains on an immediate post-test and a delayed post-test. A brief questionnaire provided supporting data on learner perceptions and study behaviour., 2) Participants / data sources, Twenty-eight doctoral students from a large European university volunteered for the study (16 female, 12 male; mean age 29.4). Participants represented engineering, life sciences, and social sciences, and all reported writing in English at least monthly. Eligibility criteria were: (i) currently enrolled in a PhD programme and (ii) no prior systematic training in spaced retrieval. All participants provided informed consent and were free to withdraw at any time without penalty., 3) Materials / instruments, We used (i) a 40-item vocabulary test consisting of target academic collocations (e.g. pose a challenge, yield results), (ii) a short background questionnaire (discipline, L1, prior exposure to academic writing instruction), and (iii) a study log exported from the spaced-retrieval app showing total minutes studied and number of review sessions. The app delivered retrieval prompts and scheduled reviews automatically. All test items were piloted with a separate cohort (n=8) to check clarity and difficulty., 4) Procedure, Participants completed a pre-test and background questionnaire in Week 1. They were then assigned either to an app-based spaced-retrieval condition or to a conventional self-study condition, and both groups received the same list of target collocations. Over the following 14 days, the app group completed daily 10-minute review sessions, while the self-study group was asked to review the list independently for the same total time. An immediate post-test took place on Day 15 and a delayed post-test on Day 29; both tests were administered online under timed conditions., 5) Data analysis, Responses were analysed in two stages. First, we computed a retention score for each participant (immediate post-test minus pre-test; delayed post-test minus pre-test). Second, we compared mean scores across groups using an independent-samples t-test and reported effect sizes (Cohen’s d) with 95% confidence intervals. For the questionnaire, Likert-scale items were summarised descriptively and open comments were coded for recurring themes (e.g. workload, usability, perceived transfer to writing)..
0%
Methods Section Structure
공유
공유
공유
만든이
Fabioslesio1
콘텐츠 편집
인쇄
퍼가기
더보기
할당
순위표
더 보기
접기
이 순위표는 현재 비공개입니다.
공유
를 클릭하여 공개할 수 있습니다.
자료 소유자가 이 순위표를 비활성화했습니다.
옵션이 자료 소유자와 다르기 때문에 이 순위표가 비활성화됩니다.
옵션 되돌리기
그룹 정렬
(은)는 개방형 템플릿입니다. 순위표에 올라가는 점수를 산출하지 않습니다.
로그인이 필요합니다
비주얼 스타일
글꼴
구독 필요
옵션
템플릿 전환하기
모두 표시
액티비티를 플레이할 때 더 많은 포맷이 나타납니다.
)
결과 열기
링크 복사
QR 코드
삭제
자동 저장된
게임을 복구할까요?