For: PACs and SuperPACs have had increasing significance in election fundraising and have been seen as vital for political campaigns., Political party allegiance remains strong and most PACs and SuperPACs ally themselves to a political party., Rich donors such as the Koch Brothers or George Seros can be argued through their wealth to have too much influence on elections., It can be argued that legislators end up being in the pocket of PACs and SuperPACs, PACs and SuperPACs can be viewed as undermining the role of political parties., Against: The amounts raised tend to favour the incumbent or established candidates, Clinton outspent Trump in 2016 through PACs and still lost so it is no guarantee of success., The right to express your opinion through fundraising is a 1st amendment right as stated by the Supreme Court., Wealthy candidates can partly fund their own campaigns or use matching funds to rely less on PACs and SuperPACs., Legislators cannot truly be bought as they will lose their voters in the election.,
0%
Week 31 POL Explore - SuperPACs
공유
공유
공유
만든이
Willdavies
Y12
Y13
Politics
콘텐츠 편집
퍼가기
더보기
순위표
더 보기
접기
이 순위표는 현재 비공개입니다.
공유
를 클릭하여 공개할 수 있습니다.
자료 소유자가 이 순위표를 비활성화했습니다.
옵션이 자료 소유자와 다르기 때문에 이 순위표가 비활성화됩니다.
옵션 되돌리기
그룹 정렬
(은)는 개방형 템플릿입니다. 순위표에 올라가는 점수를 산출하지 않습니다.
로그인이 필요합니다
비주얼 스타일
글꼴
로그인이 필요합니다
옵션
템플릿 전환하기
모두 표시
액티비티를 플레이할 때 더 많은 포맷이 나타납니다.
결과 열기
링크 복사
삭제
자동 저장된
게임을 복구할까요?