Hunter v Canary Wharf - Claim failed as spouses, children & Lodgers do not have a Legal Interest, Tetley v Chitty - Council liable as they authorised to go kart track, Cocking v Eacott - D liable for daughter's barking dog as she was in control of premises, St Helens Smelting v Tipping - Where there is physical damage, locality principle has no relevance, Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton Fireworks - Even a single event can be a nuisance if severe enough, Murdoch v Glacier Metal - Low level noise preventing sleep next to a bypass was not a nuisance, McKinnon v Walker - D liable, as all other plants also died, so the land was not "extra sensitive", Dennis v MoD - Nuisance not unlawful as the activity was useful to society, Christie v Davey - D's acts were a nuisance as they were motivated by malice, Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett - D's act was motivated, so was a nuisance despite sensitivity of the foxes., Allen v Gulf Oil - No Nuisance as Oil refinery authorised by Parliament, Marcic v Thames Water utilities - Where a statute provides a means of resolving disputes, this must be followed,
0%
Nuisance Cases
공유
공유
공유
만든이
Lsharp2
콘텐츠 편집
인쇄
퍼가기
더보기
할당
순위표
더 보기
접기
이 순위표는 현재 비공개입니다.
공유
를 클릭하여 공개할 수 있습니다.
자료 소유자가 이 순위표를 비활성화했습니다.
옵션이 자료 소유자와 다르기 때문에 이 순위표가 비활성화됩니다.
옵션 되돌리기
매치업
(은)는 개방형 템플릿입니다. 순위표에 올라가는 점수를 산출하지 않습니다.
로그인이 필요합니다
비주얼 스타일
글꼴
구독 필요
옵션
템플릿 전환하기
모두 표시
액티비티를 플레이할 때 더 많은 포맷이 나타납니다.
결과 열기
링크 복사
QR 코드
삭제
자동 저장된
게임을 복구할까요?