Inductive Reasoning, Reasoning that begins with specific observations and moves toward a probable general conclusion. It is a posteriori and based on empirical evidence., A Posteriori, Knowledge based on experience or observation, verified or falsified using empirical evidence., Cosmological Argument, An inductive, a posteriori argument claiming that the existence of the universe requires a cause, ultimately leading to a First Cause (God)., Aquinas’ First Way (Motion), Everything in motion is moved by something else; an infinite regress is impossible; therefore, there must be an unmoved mover (God)., Aquinas’ Second Way (Causation), Nothing can cause itself; there cannot be an infinite chain of causes; therefore, there must be a first efficient cause (God)., Aquinas’ Third Way (Contingency), Everything in the universe is contingent; if everything were contingent, nothing would exist; therefore, there must be a necessary being (God)., Teleological Argument (Design Argument), An inductive argument claiming that the order and purpose in the world indicate design, pointing to a designer (God)., Anthropic Principle (Tennant), The universe appears fine‑tuned for human life; this suggests purposeful design rather than chance., Aesthetic Argument (Tennant), Human appreciation of beauty and art goes beyond survival needs, suggesting a designer who created a world with aesthetic value., Empirical Evidence, Information gained through observation or experience, forming the basis of inductive arguments., Infinite Regress, A criticism that Aquinas’ rejection of an infinite chain of causes is not necessarily justified., Fallacy of Composition (Hume), The error of assuming that what is true of the parts is true of the whole (e.g., every event has a cause → the universe must have a cause)., Problem of Analogy (Hume), Critique of the design argument: the world is not sufficiently like human-designed objects to justify the analogy., Epicurean Hypothesis, Given infinite time, order could arise by chance rather than design., Inductive Leap, The move from observed evidence to a broader conclusion—always probabilistic, never certain..
0%
Inductive Arguments - Key Terms
Delen
Delen
Delen
door
Lucybaker
Inhoud Bewerken
Afdrukken
Embedden
Meer
Toewijzingen
Scorebord
Meer weergeven
Minder weergeven
Dit scoreboard is momenteel privé. Klik op
Delen
om het publiek te maken.
Dit scoreboard is uitgeschakeld door de eigenaar.
Dit scoreboard is uitgeschakeld omdat uw opties anders zijn dan die van de eigenaar.
Opties Herstellen
Verbinden
is een open template. Het genereert geen scores voor een scoreboard.
Inloggen vereist
Visuele stijl
Lettertypen
Abonnement vereist
Opties
Template wisselen
Alles weergeven
Er zullen meer templates verschijnen terwijl je de activiteit gebruikt.
)
Open resultaten
Kopieer link
QR-code
Verwijderen
Automatisch opgeslagen activiteit "
" herstellen?