Credible: A science textbook written by teachers, A news article from last week with quotes from experts, A government website with statistics, An encyclopedia entry reviewed by editors, A peer‑reviewed science journal article, A history book published by a well‑known publisher, A university website explaining a topic, A newspaper article from a trusted news organization, A museum website with artifacts and explanations, An interview with a recognized expert in the field, NOT Credible: A random blog post with no author name, A YouTube video with no sources, A rumor from a friend, A social media post with no evidence, A website with lots of ads and no author listed, A classmate’s guess without checking facts, A Wikipedia page edited by an unknown person yesterday, A celebrity opinion on science without proof, A chain email or forwarded message, A TikTok video making claims but showing no sources,
0%
En - Th.CW - Grade 5 - Unit 2.1 Credibility Checks and Source Evaluation
共享
共享
共享
由
Brianmagee
4th Grade
5th Grade
Computing
编辑内容
打印
嵌入
更多
作业
排行榜
显示更多
显示更少
此排行榜当前是私人享有。单击
,共享
使其公开。
资源所有者已禁用此排行榜。
此排行榜被禁用,因为您的选择与资源所有者不同。
还原选项
按组分配
是一个开放式模板。它不会为排行榜生成分数。
需要登录
视觉风格
字体
需要订阅
选项
切换模板
显示所有
播放活动时将显示更多格式。
打开成绩
复制链接
QR 代码
删除
恢复自动保存:
?