Carter and Cassidy (state-dependent cues), Used antihistamines and vitamin C to demonstrate state dependent forgetting, Tulving and Potska (cue-dependent recall), Showed interference disappeared if you give cues for word lists, McGeoch and McDonald (similar word lists), Had people learn two word lists of differing levels of similarity to demonstrate interference, Interference is rare (evaluation point), Limits the explanatory power of the model, Lab based findings (strength of research), Give empirical evidence for theories, Vogel (working memory differences), Described how differences in working memory capacity impacts interference of individuals, Similarity of state/context is exaggerated in experiments (criticism of retrieval failure), So retrieval failure is overstated as an explanation for forgetting, Godden and Baddeley (divers study), Had divers learn words on water or on land to demonstrate context dependent forgetting, Tulving (a theory of forgetting), Described coding specificity principle, Baddeley and Hitch (rugby players), Showed interference in the real world with rugby players remembering team names.
0%
Forgetting (easier version)
共享
共享
共享
由
Joc9
编辑内容
打印
嵌入
更多
作业
排行榜
显示更多
显示更少
此排行榜当前是私人享有。单击
,共享
使其公开。
资源所有者已禁用此排行榜。
此排行榜被禁用,因为您的选择与资源所有者不同。
还原选项
匹配游戏
是一个开放式模板。它不会为排行榜生成分数。
需要登录
视觉风格
字体
需要订阅
选项
切换模板
显示所有
播放活动时将显示更多格式。
)
打开成绩
复制链接
QR 代码
删除
恢复自动保存:
?