Hunter v Canary Wharf - Claim failed as spouses, children & Lodgers do not have a Legal Interest, Tetley v Chitty - Council liable as they authorised to go kart track, Cocking v Eacott - D liable for daughter's barking dog as she was in control of premises, St Helens Smelting v Tipping - Where there is physical damage, locality principle has no relevance, Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton Fireworks - Even a single event can be a nuisance if severe enough, Murdoch v Glacier Metal - Low level noise preventing sleep next to a bypass was not a nuisance, McKinnon v Walker - D liable, as all other plants also died, so the land was not "extra sensitive", Dennis v MoD - Nuisance not unlawful as the activity was useful to society, Christie v Davey - D's acts were a nuisance as they were motivated by malice, Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett - D's act was motivated, so was a nuisance despite sensitivity of the foxes., Allen v Gulf Oil - No Nuisance as Oil refinery authorised by Parliament, Marcic v Thames Water utilities - Where a statute provides a means of resolving disputes, this must be followed,
0%
Nuisance Cases
共享
共享
共享
由
Lsharp2
编辑内容
打印
嵌入
更多
作业
排行榜
显示更多
显示更少
此排行榜当前是私人享有。单击
,共享
使其公开。
资源所有者已禁用此排行榜。
此排行榜被禁用,因为您的选择与资源所有者不同。
还原选项
匹配游戏
是一个开放式模板。它不会为排行榜生成分数。
需要登录
视觉风格
字体
需要订阅
选项
切换模板
显示所有
播放活动时将显示更多格式。
打开成绩
复制链接
QR 代码
删除
恢复自动保存:
?