R v. White - Created the 'but for' test: 'But for' D's conduct would the consequence have occurred? , R v. Pagett - 'But for' the defendant shooting at the police, the victim would not have died. , R v. Blaue - Thin skull rule - D must take the victim as they are, R v. Jordan - Bad medical treatment will break the chain if it can be described as 'grossly negligent' and D was no longer significant contribution, R v. Cheshire - If D remains to be a significant contribution, then the chain of causation will not be broken. , R v. Smith - If wounds are still substantial and operating, D will be legal cause. , R v. Roberts - V's actions will not break chain if they are reasonably foreseeable, R v. Williams - V jumping out of a car was not reasonably foreseeable , R v. Kimsey - In order to be determined as the legal cause. D must have been more than a minimal cause. (De minimis test) ,
0%
Causation Case Match Up
共享
共享
共享
由
Zbrook
KS5
Law
显示全部
编辑内容
嵌入
更多
排行榜
显示更多
显示更少
此排行榜当前是私人享有。单击
,共享
使其公开。
资源所有者已禁用此排行榜。
此排行榜被禁用,因为您的选择与资源所有者不同。
还原选项
匹配游戏
是一个开放式模板。它不会为排行榜生成分数。
需要登录
视觉风格
字体
需要登录
选项
切换模板
显示所有
播放活动时将显示更多格式。
恢复自动保存:
?