The article points out that designers often lead the process of projects, while biologists focus on providing the content., This unequal leadership can help projects move quickly but may limit how deeply biological knowledge is used. Designers tend to treat biology as a material to design with rather than a field of study., This imbalance is like what happens in business innovation teams. For example, when developing a product, marketing teams may focus on the user experience, while engineers concentrate on making the product work., If marketing takes full control, the product might look great but not function well. This shows that interdisciplinary teams need better ways to balance leadership., One solution is to use shared decision-making tools and regularly review who leads which parts of the project. This can help ensure both design creativity and scientific depth are fully used..

Reflection/Evaluation Practice

由
打印
嵌入

排行榜

视觉风格

选项

切换模板

恢复自动保存：？