For: PACs and SuperPACs have had increasing significance in election fundraising and have been seen as vital for political campaigns., Political party allegiance remains strong and most PACs and SuperPACs ally themselves to a political party., Rich donors such as the Koch Brothers or George Seros can be argued through their wealth to have too much influence on elections., It can be argued that legislators end up being in the pocket of PACs and SuperPACs, PACs and SuperPACs can be viewed as undermining the role of political parties., Against: The amounts raised tend to favour the incumbent or established candidates, Clinton outspent Trump in 2016 through PACs and still lost so it is no guarantee of success., The right to express your opinion through fundraising is a 1st amendment right as stated by the Supreme Court., Wealthy candidates can partly fund their own campaigns or use matching funds to rely less on PACs and SuperPACs., Legislators cannot truly be bought as they will lose their voters in the election.,
0%
Week 31 POL Explore - SuperPACs
共用
由
Willdavies
Y12
Y13
Politics
編輯內容
嵌入
更多
排行榜
顯示更多
顯示更少
此排行榜當前是私有的。單擊
共用
使其公開。
資源擁有者已禁用此排行榜。
此排行榜被禁用,因為您的選項與資源擁有者不同。
還原選項
按組排序
是一個開放式範本。它不會為排行榜生成分數。
需要登錄
視覺風格
字體
需要登錄
選項
切換範本
顯示所有
播放活動時將顯示更多格式。
打開結果
複製連結
刪除
恢復自動保存:
?