1) Expensive to implement because a central server has to be set up and kept running constantly, otherwise, the network will collapse. a) Client-Server b) Peer-to-Peer 2) The server provides all the services and data, while the client only requests for services and data. a) Client-Server b) Peer-to-Peer 3) Provides better security because the file access is controlled centrally by the server and not by the clients (nodes). a) Client-Server b) Peer-to-Peer 4) Clients are dependent on the server. So, it will not work without a server a) Client-Server b) Peer-to-Peer 5) You only need to back up the server to create a backup of the data. a) Client-Server b) Peer-to-Peer 6) Each computer has to be backed up individually. a) Client-Server b) Peer-to-Peer 7) All computers can work on their own. a) Client-Server b) Peer-to-Peer 8) More vulnerable because the peers act like the server and clients at the same time. File access cannot be handled centrally and the security is handled by the users. a) Client-Server b) Peer-to-Peer 9) All the peers of the network act as service providers and clients. a) Client-Server b) Peer-to-Peer 10) Cheaper to set up than a client-server network as no central server is required. a) Client-Server b) Peer-to-Peer

SEC3 LO1 Task 12 Differences between Client-Server vs P2P

列印
嵌入

排行榜

視覺風格

選項

切換範本

恢復自動保存: ?