Hunter v Canary Wharf - Claim failed as spouses, children & Lodgers do not have a Legal Interest, Tetley v Chitty - Council liable as they authorised to go kart track, Cocking v Eacott - D liable for daughter's barking dog as she was in control of premises, St Helens Smelting v Tipping - Where there is physical damage, locality principle has no relevance, Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton Fireworks - Even a single event can be a nuisance if severe enough, Murdoch v Glacier Metal - Low level noise preventing sleep next to a bypass was not a nuisance, McKinnon v Walker - D liable, as all other plants also died, so the land was not "extra sensitive", Dennis v MoD - Nuisance not unlawful as the activity was useful to society, Christie v Davey - D's acts were a nuisance as they were motivated by malice, Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett - D's act was motivated, so was a nuisance despite sensitivity of the foxes., Allen v Gulf Oil - No Nuisance as Oil refinery authorised by Parliament, Marcic v Thames Water utilities - Where a statute provides a means of resolving disputes, this must be followed,
0%
Nuisance Cases
共用
共用
共用
由
Lsharp2
KS5
編輯內容
列印
嵌入
更多
作業
排行榜
顯示更多
顯示更少
此排行榜當前是私有的。單擊
共用
使其公開。
資源擁有者已禁用此排行榜。
此排行榜被禁用,因為您的選項與資源擁有者不同。
還原選項
匹配遊戲
是一個開放式範本。它不會為排行榜生成分數。
需要登錄
視覺風格
字體
需要訂閱
選項
切換範本
顯示所有
播放活動時將顯示更多格式。
打開結果
複製連結
QR 代碼
刪除
恢復自動保存:
?