R v. White - Created the 'but for' test: 'But for' D's conduct would the consequence have occurred? , R v. Pagett - 'But for' the defendant shooting at the police, the victim would not have died. , R v. Blaue - Thin skull rule - D must take the victim as they are, R v. Jordan - Bad medical treatment will break the chain if it can be described as 'grossly negligent' and D was no longer significant contribution, R v. Cheshire - If D remains to be a significant contribution, then the chain of causation will not be broken. , R v. Smith - If wounds are still substantial and operating, D will be legal cause. , R v. Roberts - V's actions will not break chain if they are reasonably foreseeable, R v. Williams - V jumping out of a car was not reasonably foreseeable , R v. Kimsey - In order to be determined as the legal cause. D must have been more than a minimal cause. (De minimis test) ,
0%
Causation Case Match Up
共用
共用
共用
由
Zbrook
KS5
Law
顯示全部
編輯內容
嵌入
更多
排行榜
顯示更多
顯示更少
此排行榜當前是私有的。單擊
共用
使其公開。
資源擁有者已禁用此排行榜。
此排行榜被禁用,因為您的選項與資源擁有者不同。
還原選項
匹配遊戲
是一個開放式範本。它不會為排行榜生成分數。
需要登錄
視覺風格
字體
需要登錄
選項
切換範本
顯示所有
播放活動時將顯示更多格式。
恢復自動保存:
?