BRIGGS: emphasizes faith in jury and legal system, primarily questions credibility of the prosecution's witnesses, mentions James King briefly, does not offer explicit arguments in favor of King's innocence, O'BRIEN: praises jury and their responsibility, points out lack of credibility of the prosecution's witnesses, explains extensively why Steve was not involved, points put difference between Steve's character and the ones of the other young men, emphasizes that Steve's guilt has not been proven, PETROCELLI: briefly recognizes jury's role, argues that the witnesses of minor importance, emphasizes the importance of the deed and its outcome, focusses on the victim's fate, infers King's and Steve's guilt, but cannot offer any definite proof,

Closing Arguments

โดย
สั่งพิมพ์
ฝัง

ลีดเดอร์บอร์ด

สไตล์ภาพ

ตัวเลือก

สลับแม่แบบ

คืนค่าการบันทึกอัตโนมัติ: ใช่ไหม