For: PACs and SuperPACs have had increasing significance in election fundraising and have been seen as vital for political campaigns., Political party allegiance remains strong and most PACs and SuperPACs ally themselves to a political party., Rich donors such as the Koch Brothers or George Seros can be argued through their wealth to have too much influence on elections., It can be argued that legislators end up being in the pocket of PACs and SuperPACs, PACs and SuperPACs can be viewed as undermining the role of political parties., Against: The amounts raised tend to favour the incumbent or established candidates, Clinton outspent Trump in 2016 through PACs and still lost so it is no guarantee of success., The right to express your opinion through fundraising is a 1st amendment right as stated by the Supreme Court., Wealthy candidates can partly fund their own campaigns or use matching funds to rely less on PACs and SuperPACs., Legislators cannot truly be bought as they will lose their voters in the election.,

Week 31 POL Explore - SuperPACs

por
Incrustar

Tabla de clasificación

Estilo visual

Opciones

Cambiar plantilla

¿Restaurar actividad almacenada automáticamente: ?