R v. Franklin  - The unlawful act must be criminal , R v. Lowe - The unlawful act cannot be an omission , R v. Lamb - If there is no unlawful act, D cannot be charged with UAM , R v. Cato - Even if V consents to the unlawful act, D will still be liable, R v. Church - Would a sober and reasonable person foresee the risk of some physical harm from D's act? , R v. Newbury and Jones - It is irrelevant what D intends or can foresee, R v. JM and SM - The exact type of harm does not need to be foreseeable as long as some physical harm is. , R v. Watson - If D becomes aware that V is vulnerable and frail, then the RM may foresee some physical harm , R v. Mitchell - If a third party's actions are RF then it will not break the chain , R v. Lewis - If V's attempt to escape is reasonably foreseeable, then it will not break the chain of causation , R v. Rogers - If D's part in the unlawful act is a significant contribution, then chain of causation will not be broken by V's actions,

UAM Case Ratio Match Up

bởi

Bảng xếp hạng

Phong cách trực quan

Tùy chọn

Chuyển đổi mẫu

Bạn có muốn khôi phục tự động lưu: không?