Red-Flag, Caller insists on urgent arrears payment needed “today”, Executor details differ from documents submitted previously., Different spellings of the member’s name across attachments., Caller avoids or refuses to repeat ID&V answers, Document contains mismatched fonts, formatting, or layout anomalies., Signature spacing appears inconsistent with known samples., Claim submitted shortly after a similar rejected claim., Caller gives contradictory information about when documents were sent., Email domain seems unusual or unrelated to the stated organisation., Caller pressures staff to bypass verification due to a “sensitive time”., Multiple individuals claim the same entitlement, Overseas arrears request with unclear estate or executor details., Provided ID documents show signs of digital alteration., Caller claims to have spoken to a staff member who does not exist., Payment request includes banking details that differ from previous records., Low-Risk, Caller asks for an update on the arrears processing timeline., Executor asks if ID needs to be re-sent after a system note update, Caller corrects a misspelling immediately after noticing it, Email from personal domain but matches contact details on file., Caller asks which documents are still outstanding, Caller provides all verification answers after clarifying a question, Low‑resolution attachment but consistent information, Caller unsure of exact dates but provides consistent context, Caller confirms safe receipt of estate documents., Executor asks whether HMRC needs to be notified separately, Caller checks if payments will be paused following a death report, Caller phones twice a week for reassurance., Solicitor’s secretary calls and provides full contact details, Caller mentions upcoming travel but no pressure to rush payments, Formatting differences due to printing/scanning

Fraud card

by
Print
Embed

Leaderboard

Visual style

Options

Switch template

Continue editing: ?