A junior dev submitted their first PR. One variable is named wrong. → "This is wrong.", Someone proposed using a new library in standup. → "No.", A teammate pushed code that broke the staging build. → "Did you even test this?", A function returns null instead of an empty array. → "This doesn't work.", A designer delivered a mockup without mobile screens. → "Not what I asked for.", A teammate refactored a module and introduced three bugs. → "Start over.", A developer used an unconventional but working solution. → "I'm sure this made sense when you wrote it.", Someone presented a new feature architecture in a meeting. → "Interesting approach.", A teammate submitted a PR two hours before the deadline. → "As always, the deadline was more important than quality.", A colleague's bug fix introduced a new issue. → "I'll fix it myself, it's faster.", A developer wrote deeply nested conditional logic. → "Good luck maintaining this in six months.", A junior wrote their first API endpoint — it mostly works. → "Thanks for… trying.", A developer forgot to handle a null case. → "This is a basic mistake. Please review the fundamentals.", The same naming convention issue appeared in a second PR. → "We've discussed this pattern before. I shouldn't have to repeat myself.", A backend dev wrote their first frontend component and got the state management wrong. → "Anyone with experience in this area would know not to do this.", A function has O(n²) complexity where O(n) is possible. → "I don't have time to explain why this is bad — just Google it.", A mid-level dev submitted a feature that works but isn't optimized. → "This is junior-level work.", A teammate sent a technical spec document for review. → "Everything here is a problem.", A developer implemented a caching layer. → "The logic is completely wrong.", A PR touches 14 files and mixes refactoring with new features. → "This is a mess.", A junior submitted a data migration script. → "None of this is acceptable.", A teammate proposed a microservices split for a monolith. → "The whole approach is off.", A developer accidentally pushed console.log statements to production. → "Wow. Just… wow.", A hotfix for a bug introduced two new ones. → "Congratulations, you've made it worse.", A teammate chose to store session data in localStorage. → "Bold choice.", A PR has no tests and the deadline is tomorrow. → "Sure, let's ship this and see what happens.", A developer keeps submitting PRs without addressing previous review comments. → "I've reviewed this three times now and every time there are new issues. I don't know what's going on but this needs to stop.", A teammate reopened a PR that was closed for rework, without making changes. → "This PR sat in review for a week and it still has the same problems I flagged last time. Is anyone actually reading my comments?".
0%
Improve feedback
Share
Share
Share
by
Innag
Edit Content
Print
Embed
More
Assignments
Leaderboard
Show more
Show less
This leaderboard is currently private. Click
Share
to make it public.
This leaderboard has been disabled by the resource owner.
This leaderboard is disabled as your options are different to the resource owner.
Revert Options
Speaking cards
is an open-ended template. It does not generate scores for a leaderboard.
Log in required
Visual style
Fonts
Subscription required
Options
Switch template
Show all
More formats will appear as you play the activity.
)
Open results
Copy link
QR code
Delete
Continue editing:
?