Evaluation, The writer successfully creates suspicion of the narrator when he admits to “enacting Concerned Husband”, making the reader question whether his reaction is genuine., The description of the house is particularly effective because the signs of disturbance suggest something serious has happened, while the writer avoids giving the reader any clear answers., Carl's silent observation of the narrator creates an uncomfortable atmosphere and makes the reader feel that Nick himself may be under scrutiny., The ending is highly effective because the simple statement ‘Amy was gone’ confirms her disappearance whilst increasing the mystery surrounding what has happened to her., Analysis, The writer uses the compound adjectives ‘wide-gaping-ominous open’ to make the open door seem threatening and to foreshadow danger., The repetition of ‘Amy!’ highlights the narrator's urgency and helps build tension as his search becomes increasingly frantic., The listing of damaged objects, including the ‘shattered’ coffee table and overturned furniture, creates a chaotic image that suggests a struggle may have taken place., The short sentences at the end of the extract slow the pace and emphasise the significance of Amy's disappearance.

Evaluation or Analysis?

Leaderboard

Visual style

Options

Switch template

Continue editing: ?