The clause contains several conditions and exceptions. You want to give the listener a clear structure before explaining the details. Which expression would you use?, There are basically three parts to it., A practical example would be..., By “liability,” I mean..., Does that make sense so far?, ______ this clause explains when either party can terminate the agreement., From there, we..., By “termination,” I mean..., Does that make sense so far?, In other words,..., You have explained a legal term and now want to define exactly what you mean by it. Which expression is most appropriate?, Think of it like this..., By “indemnification,” I mean..., Let me put that another way., The final part is..., You have explained the first requirement and now want to move to the next part of the explanation. Which expression fits best?, Is that clearer?, The simplest way to explain it is..., From there, we..., By “requirement,” I mean..., A stakeholder still looks confused after your first explanation. You want to explain the same idea differently. Which expression would be most appropriate?, Let me put that another way., There are basically three parts to it., The final part is..., The first thing to understand is..., You want to help someone understand a contractual concept by giving them a real situation., In other words,..., The first thing to understand is..., What that means is..., A practical example would be..., “The supplier is responsible for losses caused by a breach, subject to certain limitations.” You want to explain the practical meaning of this statement., There are basically three parts to it., Does that make sense so far?, What that means is that the supplier may have to compensate us, but its responsibility is not unlimited., The final part is the supplier's responsibility., ______, we need to clarify who is responsible if the supplier fails to meet its obligations., By “supplier,” I mean..., In other words,..., From there, we..., The final part is..., You have explained a complex clause in several stages and want to check whether the stakeholder is following your explanation., The simplest way to explain it is..., Think of it like this..., Does that make sense so far?, A practical example would be..., You want to explain the concept of a penalty clause to someone without a legal background. Which option is the clearest?, By “penalty clause,” I mean a provision that establishes a consequence if a contractual obligation is not fulfilled., From there, we look at the penalty., The final part is the penalty clause., Does that make sense so far?, You have just rephrased a complicated explanation in simpler language. What would you most naturally say next to check whether the person now understands?, The first thing to understand is..., From there, we..., By “clause,” I mean..., Is that clearer?, You need to explain a clause containing three main elements: the notice period, the termination conditions, and the financial consequences. Which option creates the clearest structure?, Think of it like this: the clause has several legal provisions., There are basically three parts to it. The first thing to understand is the notice period. From there, we look at the termination conditions. The final part is the financial consequence., In other words, the clause is quite complicated., A practical example would be a company terminating the agreement.

Making Complex Clauses Clear

by
Print
Embed

Leaderboard

Visual style

Options

AI Enhanced: This activity contains content generated by AI. Learn more.

Switch template

Continue editing: ?