1) What did you like/dislike about the interview questions? 2) What are your initial thoughts about the structure and format of the interview scripts? 3) Are there any parts or questions that you find confusing or unclear? 4) Do you feel that the scripts adequately cover the different experiences of young people who left the program at different stages? 5) What additional topics or questions do you think should be included in the scripts? 6) What changes would you suggest to the wording or tone of the questions to make them more relatable and understandable? 7) Were any of the questions too personal or would make you uncomfortable? 8) Do you think the scripts are inclusive? Do they speak to everyone? (different gender, ethnicities, etc.) 9) What would you change in the introduction to make sure young people understand the importance of this interview and make sure they are keen to answer the questions? 10) How do you feel mental health was handled in the scripts? 11) Do you think the scale statements provided were useful to answer questions? 12) What questions or prompts did you feel were unnecessary? 13) After seeing all three scripts, which script do you think is the strongest in terms of capturing the experiences of young people? 14) Are there any common themes or issues that emerge across all three scripts that you think should be addressed? 15) What would you suggest to improve the overall structure or content of the scripts to better serve the evaluation process?

JGW+ Evaluation

Print
Embed

Leaderboard

Visual style

Options

Switch template

Continue editing: ?