Hunter v Canary Wharf - Claim failed as spouses, children & Lodgers do not have a Legal Interest, Tetley v Chitty - Council liable as they authorised to go kart track, Cocking v Eacott - D liable for daughter's barking dog as she was in control of premises, St Helens Smelting v Tipping - Where there is physical damage, locality principle has no relevance, Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton Fireworks - Even a single event can be a nuisance if severe enough, Murdoch v Glacier Metal - Low level noise preventing sleep next to a bypass was not a nuisance, McKinnon v Walker - D liable, as all other plants also died, so the land was not "extra sensitive", Dennis v MoD - Nuisance not unlawful as the activity was useful to society, Christie v Davey - D's acts were a nuisance as they were motivated by malice, Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett - D's act was motivated, so was a nuisance despite sensitivity of the foxes., Allen v Gulf Oil - No Nuisance as Oil refinery authorised by Parliament, Marcic v Thames Water utilities - Where a statute provides a means of resolving disputes, this must be followed,

Nuisance Cases

Print
Embed

Leaderboard

Visual style

Options

Switch template

Continue editing: ?